Archive | agosto 2013

http://www.cadoinpiedi.it/2013/02/21/la_senatrice_pdl_scrive_ai_parroci_umbri_uno_le_risponde_cosi.html

http://www.cadoinpiedi.it/2013/02/21/la_senatrice_pdl_scrive_ai_parroci_umbri_uno_le_risponde_cosi.html

Annunci

L’igiene del contesto sociale.

 

Oggi sono stato invitato da amici in un esclusivo e storico club torinese, mi sono bastati pochi minuti per comprendere il perché in tutti gli anni, durate i quali avevo vissuto a Torino, oltre ad una evidente ragione economica che certamente aveva prevalso, specie negli anni trascorsi con lo stipendio di funzionario pubblico, non mi era mai balenata l’idea di iscrivermi.
 
Oggi ho capito che la ragione inconscia che mi distanzia da quel mondo sta nell’atteggiamento snobista della maggior parte dei suoi componenti. 
 
Ho sempre inteso la società come, seppur stratificata e diversificata, aperta, acastica, piena di opportunità per elevarsi e piena di insidie capaci di provocare repentine ascese. 
 
L’ingresso del club è presidiato da personale che conosce uno per uno tutti gli associati, pronto ad individuare l’intruso ovvero il soggetto estraneo al “contesto”.
 
L’ambiente che si apriva ai miei occhi mi portò la mente ad un lontano ricordo fiabesco di esclusivi circoli coloniali indiani, dove erano ammessi solamente ufficiali di sua Maestà, ruffiani, prostitute e lacchè; quest’ultimi evidentemente relegati e confinati da sguardi commiserevoli ma schifati dei colonialisti e delle loro signore.
 
Tavolini ben ordinati, una stupenda piscina e viali alberati dove anziane ed abbronzate madame passeggiavano.
 
Dopo aver chiesto il permesso ai miei ospiti mi recavo alla toilette davanti alla quale incrociavo una diligentissima ed efficientissima addetta alle pulizie; eppure qualcosa non mi piaceva in quell’ambiente, avevo la sensazione che ci fosse qualche angolo sudicio.  
 
Dopo aver espletato il mio leggero bisogno fisiologico, mi apprestavo a lavarmi le mani, alzavo lo sguardo e al lato allo specchio, ecco apparire d’un tratto la motivazione che da anni mi tiene lontano da quei posti, quell’angolo sudicio. 
 
Un cartello blu chiaro, 20 centimetri per 40, che recava una scritta in basso rilievo, con caratteri in colore bianco, la quale recitava pressapoco così:
” siete vivamente invitati a rispettare l’igiene dei locali, in considerazione del contesto nel quale vi trovate”. 
 
Ovvero, urinate e defecate pure fuori dal water, sputate per terra, gettate cartacce di qua e di là, ma fatelo nella bocciofila sotto casa vostra, non qui, questo contesto è differente, vi travate tra VIP e nel cesso dei VIP, quindi comportatevi da VIP, centrate il buco. 
 
Ci sarebbe  da scrivere un vero e proprio trattato di psicologia sociale, ma mi esimo dal farlo, mi limitavo ad uscire dalla toilette, raggiungere i miei gentili ospiti, tutt’altro che snob, salutarli con una certa fretta, dandogli appuntamento magari alla bocciofila difronte allo Studio e pedalare velocemente verso l’uscita, ringraziando il buon Dio di non avermi mai dato l’opportunità di entrare a far perte del mondo dorato di quel contesto igienizzato.
 
 
 

Russian version

Клаудио Lojodicе Социолог – Геополитические консультант

Горькое чувство, причиной которого явились мерзкие действия, проводимые в Риме против Алмы и меленькой Алуа, не могло быть просто похоронено в отдаленном уголке моего сознания.

Это было бы равносильно отмене всех наших завоеваний свобод, которые нам с трудом удалось получить в моей стране. Именно поэтому я решил более углубленно изучить этот вопрос.

В ходе моего исследования я нашел документ, изданный Аблязовым в 2001 году, это Манифест его политической партии «Демократический выбор Казахстана». Я считаю, что этот документ, который я перевел с помощью моей жены, является признанием Мухтара Аблязова в любви к своей Родине и того, что он сделал для своей страны.

Документ содержит предложения по демократическим преобразованиям, которые были почерпаны из принципов прямой демократии. Вам наверно интересно, как такой богатый и влиятельный человек, которым был в те годы Аблязов, почувствовал необходимость искоренения коррупции и единоличной централизованной власти в политике и экономике.

Существует только один ответ: Аблязов, будучи бизнесменом и частью политического истеблишмента, сумел увидеть, что народ на гране голода и принять это, как свою личную боль.

Его карьера началась со скромного происхождения, но он преуспел исключительно благодаря своему великому уму. Как и его жена, Алма Шалабаева, депортированная из Италии, он с теплотой вспоминал их небольшую девятиметровую квартиру, где они совместно проживали, и где родилась их первая дочь.

Люди, которые знают меня, хорошо осведомлены, что я не проявляю милосердие в отношении преступников, занимающихся отмыванием денег, но здесь я считаю, что это совсем другая история. Вся информация, собранная до сих пор (хотя необходимы дальнейшие исследования), не позволяет предполагать, что Аблязов просто преступник, напротив, в соответствии с имеющимися документами, вероятнее всего, что Ablayzov является жертвой политических преследований.

Один факт, в частности, поразил меня особенно (даже если балансы должны по-прежнему быть глубоко проанализированы): хотя у Банка, основанного Аблязовым, были долги более 1100%, он все еще продолжал давать кредиты людям. В случаях, как этот, только история сможет объяснить являлось ли поведение Аблязова уголовным преступлением или нет. На сегодняшний день неоспоримо одно, как только Аблязов решил встать против власти и политической коррупции, вещи начали идти плохо для него и для его семьи.

Я пытался объяснить мою точку зрения адвокатам семьи: бой не должен проводиться исключительно в судах, но должен вестись и на международном поле, например, в сотрудничестве с европейской организацией Открытый диалог. Однако, мои предложения не были рассмотрены, более того, меня стали в чем то подозревать, может я говорил не с теми людьми, которые могли бы понять, что кроме профессионализма, нужно иметь идеалы.

Во всех этих событиях было несколько стратегических ошибок, которые привели к вылету из Лондона, на мой взгляд, ненужному, незаконному укрывательству в Риме, аресту Саши Павлова в Мадриде и аресту Аблязова во Франции.

Понятно, что тот, кто советовал семье до сих пор, принять Аблязову неправильную стратегию, привел семью к катастрофе, и это факт.

Вмешательство теперь будет более трудным, но все еще возможным. Отметим, что есть много людей поддерживающих Аблязова и, прежде всего, те, кто находится рядом и Алма.

Что мы можем сделать сегодня, используя коммуникационную стратегию: организовывать встречи, лично присутствовать, подавать официальные просьбы европейским властям.

Я поддержу всех, кто готов начать эти инициативы, если они будут осуществляться мирными способами. Пожалуйста, дайте мне знать, если вы согласны с моей предлагаемой стратегией.

ABLYAZOV’S DEMOCRATIC PROJECT AND CONSEQUENT PERSECUTION

 

Claudio Loiodice

Sociologist – Geopolitical Consultant

 

ABLYAZOV’S DEMOCRATIC PROJECT AND CONSEQUENT PERSECUTION

 

The bitter feeling caused by that vile action carried out in Rome against Alma and the little Alua cannot remain confined in a remote corner of our mind.

It would be like cancelling all our conquests for freedom that we hardly managed to obtain in my Country.

I am not willing to give up and that is why I wanted to examine in depth the matter.

As I was researching I found a document filed by Ablyazov in 2001, it is the manifesto of his political party “Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan”. I believe that this document, that I am translating with the help of my wife, is a declaration of love that Mukhtar Ablyazov made to his homeland.

The document contains democratic reformations that took inspiration from Direct Democracy. At this point you wonder how come a rich and powerful man, as Ablyazov was in those years, felt the need of denouncing corruption and centralization of power and of economy.

There is only one answer: Ablyazov was sick of being part of that business/political establishment and of seeing his people on the edge of starvation.

His career started from humble origins and he succeeded  solely thanks to his undoubtedly great mind, as his wife, Alma Shalabayeva, deported from Italy recalled. She fondly recalled their little home of 9 sq.m. that they shared with others and where their first daughter was born.

People who know me well know that I show no mercy for criminals and for money launderers but I believe that this is a different story. All the information gathered until now, even though further investigation is required, do not lead me to believe that Ablyazov is a mere criminal; on the contrary, from the documents I examined, it is very likely that Ablayzov is victim of political persecution.

One fact in particular surprised me, even if the balance sheets have to still deeply analyzed: even though the Bank founded by Ablyazov had debts over 1.100%, it still continued to give loans to people.

In cases like this one, only History will be able to explain whether Ablyazov’s behavior was criminally relevant or not. As of today, it is a fact that as soon as Ablyazov decided to stand against power and political corruption, things started going bad for him and for his family.

 

 

I tried to explain my point to the family’s lawyers: the battle should not be led solely in Courts, but it should be led also in an international field and, for example, a dialogue with Europe should be opened. Not only my suggestions were not considered, but I believe they became suspicious of me, maybe because the people I spoke with are not used to relate with people who are both professionals and pursue ideals.

In this whole event there have been several strategic mistakes that led to the escape from London, in my opinion unnecessary, the secret and illegal hiding place in Rome, Sasha Pavlov’s arrest in Madrid and Ablyazov’s arrest in France.

It is clear that whoever counseled the Ablyazov family until now took the wrong strategy, it was a disaster, and this is a fact.

Intervening now is more difficult but it is still possible. I noted that there are many who support Ablyazov and, above all, who are close to Alma.

What we can do today is acting out a communication strategy, organize meetings, present personally formal requests to the European Authorities.

I am available support all of you who are willing to start these initiatives, as long as they are carried out in peaceful manners.

Please let me know if you agree with my suggested strategy.

 

17/08/2013

Claudio Loiodice

 

Adriano Sofri et Shalabayeva case

 

 

 

I read today the interview that Adriano Sofri made to Alma Shalablayeva.

I would like to share my comments also referring to one of my previous posts made some days ago.

In order to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to specify that Adriano Sofri is now free citizen and a respectable person, at least as I know of.

It is not my intention to morally judge anyone, let alone long gone events. In my early age I was very close to an extreme left  wing political movement, named LOTTA CONTINUA , and Sofri was our leader. Several years later it was found out that it was some members of that movement that killed a Police Official, Luigi Calabresi. According to a definitive Court Decision it was the same Adriano Sofri who commissioned the murder. Today Sofri is a fully respectable journalist, who writes  articles that I often share, he paid his debt towards justice even if he always claimed himself innocent.

I would like everyone, including also Sofri,  to acknowledge that that vile act was a terrorist act and that had nothing to do with the legitimate political struggle. I believe that the 70s and the 80s were years full of violence against democracy, which may not have been prefect and may have been corrupted in some cases, but it was a democracy. Those years had nothing in common with what is happening nowadays in Kazakhstan, where oppression and repression is clear. Not even in this case, however, I would share terrorist acts.

To sum up, I wish the Kazakh matter was not exploited from any part. One may get to the paradoxical situation of comparing Berlusconi to a  victim of political persecution or comparing the Italian political terrorists of the 70s and of today to the Kazakh protesters. It is not so: the Kazakh matter is a different story, it belongs to a different context which is in full social and economical transformation and that witnessed several victims amongst the population, all facts that have been exposed by several human rights non governmental organizations.

 Until now Sofri kept his personal story aside from the facts that he daily writes about. I do hope he continues to do so and that he does not try to find eventual explanations to distant past events and ideologies, of which no one can be proud.

I wish the Kazakh people will be able to solve their situation without bloodshed and without terror acts, which are always deplorable. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 > Ho letto oggi l’intervista di Adriano Sofri a Alma Shalabayeva e, rimandando ad un mio commento fatto in questi giorni, vorrei esprimere le mie valutazioni. Tengo a precisare, prima di essere frainteso che Adriano Sofri oggi è un libero cittadino e una persona per bene, almeno credo.
> Non voglio condannare moralmente nessuno, tantomeno episodi lontani nel tempo. Da giovane sono stato molto vicino ad un movimento politico di estrema sinistra, che si chiamava LOTTA CONTINUA, Sofri era il nostro leader. Molti anno dopo si venne a sapere che alcuni appartenenti a quel movimento nel 1972 avevano ucciso un commissario di Polizia, Luigi Calabresi. Secondo una sentenza definitiva ad ordinare l’omicidio fu proprio Adriano Sofri. Oggi Sofri è un perfetto e rispettabile giornalista, che scrive cose da me spessissimo condivise, ha pagato il suo debito ma si è sempre dichiarato innocente.
> Vorrei che venisse riconosciuto da tutti, anche da SOFRI, che quell’atto di viltà fu un atto terroristico, che nulla aveva in comune con una lotta politica legittima. Credo che gli anni 70/80 siano stati anni di violenza contro una democrazia, certo non perfetta, a volte corrotta, ma pur sempre una democrazia. Nulla a che vedere con quello che sta accadendo ora dal Kazakhistan, da dove provengono segnali di oppressione e repressione, comunque nemmeno in questo caso condividerei atti di terrorismo.
> In sintesi, non vorrei che la questione KAZAKA venisse strumentalizzata da una e dall’altra parte; si potrebbe arrivare ala paradosso di paragonare BERLUSCONI ad un perseguitato polito o i terroristi italiani di allora e di oggi, ai manifestanti kazakii. Non è così, la vicenda Kazaka è un’altra storia, vive in un contesto di transizione socioeconomica, che fin ora ha maturato vittime solamente dalla parte della gente, sanzionata da numerosissime organizzazioni non governative di tutela dei diritti.
>
> Finora Sofri ha mantenuto la sua storia personale lontano dalle vicende che tratta quotidianamente e spero continui a farlo, senza cercare eventuali giustificazioni a gesti o ideologie remote, delle quali nessuno può andarne fiero.
>
> Al popolo Kazako auguro di risolvere la questione interna senza spargimento di sangue e senza ricorrere ad atti terroristici, sempre e comunque d condannare.
>